Emily Eyrolles Sobeck, Ph. D
Franciscan University

Rachel Robertson, Ph.D., BCBA-D
University of Pittsburgh

Both the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) legislation and the Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) clause within Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) of 2004 have impacted the educational service delivery for students with disabilities and the paraeducators that provide support services. As more schools turn to inclusionary practices, the impetus for highly trained paraeducators becomes of even more importance. The purpose of this mixed-methodology survey study was to identify the current practices and barriers of training for paraeducators who work with students with autism in inclusive settings and to compare and contrast the perspectives of principals, special education teachers, and paraeducators regarding these practices and barriers. This survey included 96 participants across the three participant groups. Discussion centers on the inadequate amount of training paraeducators receive, confusion on who is responsible for providing paraeducator training, the use of ineffective training methods, and making paraeducators a priority within the school structure. 

Keywords: paraeducator, teaching assistant, paraprofessional training, inclusion, autism

• To Read this Article - or Download this Article (login required)

• To Download the Entire WINTER 2019 Issue of JAASEP -  (login required)

NASET Members -  Login to Access These Files.

If you are a member of NASET, please login to freely access this and all archived articles of JAASEP

If you are NOT A MEMBER of NASET you may purchase this article of JAASEP for $4.95 (use the "Buy now" button below):

OR Buy the entire issue of JAASEP WINTER 2019 for $19.95. Use the BUY NOW button below:

OR - Join NASET and have access to this & ALL PAST ISSUES of JAASEP - JOIN NASET

Return to the Table of Contents - CLICK HERE