Q & A Corner - Issue #82

NASET Q & A Corner

Questions and Answers on

U. S. Supreme Court Case Decision Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District Re-1

Introduction

On March 22, 2017 the U.S. Supreme Court (sometimes referred to as Court) issued a unanimous opinion in Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District Re-1, 137 S. Ct. 988. In that case, the Court interpreted the scope of the free appropriate public education (FAPE) requirements in the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The Court overturned the Tenth Circuit’s decision that Endrew, a child with autism, was only entitled to an educational program that was calculated to provide “merely more than de minimis” educational benefit. In rejecting the Tenth Circuit’s reasoning, the Supreme Court determined that, “[t]o meet its substantive obligation under the IDEA, a school must offer an IEP [individualized education program] that is reasonably calculated to enable a child to make progress appropriate in light of the child’s circumstances.” The Court additionally emphasized the requirement that “every child should have the chance to meet challenging objectives.” The Endrew F. decision is important because it informs our efforts to improve academic outcomes for children with disabilities. To this end, the U.S. Department of Education (Department) is providing parents and other stakeholders information on the issues addressed in Endrew F. and the impact of the Court’s decision on the implementation of the IDEA. This issue of NASET’s Q & A Corner focuses on the Endrew F. case and its impact on the field of special education.

Not a Member?

If you are a member of NASET, please login to freely access this and all archived articles.

If you are NOT A MEMBER of NASET you may purchase this article for $.99 (use the "Buy now" button above) or Join NASET for free access to this and all articles within past publications..

NASET Members - Login to access this issue of the NASET Q & A Corner

lost password?